top of page

Why Veterans Opposed the Downtown Fire Station Proposal

recallburgis
Aug 3
2 min read

Updated: Aug 18

The dispute over Brentwood's downtown fire station is sometimes described as opposition to better fire service.


That is not how the veterans who spoke out described it.


Their argument was that Brentwood can have improved fire protection without sacrificing land and facilities that have served local veterans for generations.


Why this property matters

The downtown Brentwood property has been associated with veterans since 1921, and the Veterans Memorial Hall became a longstanding location for veterans' organizations, ceremonies, meetings and community events.


When plans for the East County Community Service Center included relocating the fire station and redeveloping property connected to the Veterans Memorial Hall, veterans and residents began asking what would happen to that use and whether alternatives had been adequately considered.


The alternative veterans pointed to

One veteran, Mike Meyokovich, laid out the argument in a May 2025 letter published by The Press.


He argued that a Sand Creek property had previously been prepared for a future fire station and questioned why that location was no longer being pursued. He also raised legal questions about transfers involving the veterans' property and argued that the proposed downtown site was too constrained for future expansion.


Whether someone agrees with every part of that argument or not, these were substantive concerns. They deserved a substantive response.


This is the part that concerns me

The issue is not whether Brentwood needs good fire service. Of course it does.


The issue is whether a major decision affecting a century-old veterans facility was made after genuinely working through the alternatives with the people most affected.


Veterans and residents appeared at public meetings, wrote letters and asked questions. I believe those concerns were too often treated as obstacles to a project rather than information that should help shape it.


The original veteran letter and the public meeting record should be read directly. I encourage people to do that before deciding where they stand.


Sources



bottom of page